Btw, everytime I'm here actually all I do is small talk
riku2 wrote:Another thing to add is that finns are not used to foreigners speaking (less than perfect) finnish, so are unable to make allowances for different pronunciation and simple mistakes. This makes it discouraging when people don't understand you.
My mother in law didn't understand something I said in finnish since I pronounced "finnair" in a more english way than the way a finn would say it (they would say something like finn-ire). It's at this point I thought why bother learning if people are going to demand so much precision with their difficult language.
Meanwhile I (as a brit) work daily with people from India, Brazil, Taiwan, all over, with all of them trying to speak english and me trying to understand their wildly different accents, grammar and pronunciation of english.
007 wrote:tuulen wrote:And the other is a very highly abbreviated form, where a single Finnish word could be modified as to convey no less than a sentence's worth of information, and possibly an entire paragraph's worth of information.
any examples?
Here we are, you and I, speaking English, but Finnish is an entirely different language. Then consider the origins of the Finnish language, as a Uralic language. The Uralic languages originate in the far north, where winters are very long and very cold, as where a person breathes in cold air but then breathes out somewhat warmer air, meaning that a person in the far north loses body heat every time they exhale, which they can not afford to do. And so the Finnish language evolved to minimize the amount of body heat lost during conversation.
007 wrote:That's deep lol
tuulen wrote: You could offer a more plausible theory?
tuulen wrote:... the other is a very highly abbreviated form, where a single Finnish word could be modified as to convey no less than a sentence's worth of information, and possibly an entire paragraph's worth of information.
tuulen wrote: ....consider the origins of the Finnish language, as a Uralic language. The Uralic languages originate in the far north, where winters are very long and very cold, as where a person breathes in cold air but then breathes out somewhat warmer air, meaning that a person in the far north loses body heat every time they exhale, which they can not afford to do. And so the Finnish language evolved to minimize the amount of body heat lost during conversation.
Probably the economizing of the words happened already during right after the Ice Age when the Proto-Finns moved over and found it feasible to keep their mouth shut and use the energy for keeping warm.
007 wrote:tuulen wrote: You could offer a more plausible theory?
I am skeptical about the very existence of such abbreviated form
tuulen wrote:Pursuivant wrote:Ai?
Totta kai.
007 wrote:tuulen wrote: You could offer a more plausible theory?
OK, consider the following:tuulen wrote:Pursuivant wrote:Ai?
Totta kai.
Pursuivant asks, "Oh?", and I respond, "Certainly." And that is an abbreviated Finnish conversation!
Pursuivant wrote:Babbling foreigner, the Finnish answer is
Joo.
AldenG wrote:
!!!tuulen wrote:007 wrote:tuulen wrote: You could offer a more plausible theory?
I am skeptical about the very existence of such abbreviated form
OK, consider the following:tuulen wrote:Pursuivant wrote:Ai?
Totta kai.
Pursuivant asks, "Oh?", and I respond, "Certainly." And that is an abbreviated Finnish conversation!
In terms of communication, English and Finnish are opposites. For instance, in English perhaps we could anticipate "correct" grammar and then "notice" any incorrect grammar. Yet the priority in Finnish is "direct" communication and "correct" grammar is then considered a waste of energy and time.
Pursuivant wrote:The same in foreign language
- Well, my learned colleague Tuulen, I really appreciate your input, but let me present my sincere query whether your opinion is based on irrifutible facts?
- Oh certainly colleague Pursuivant, we have achieved this through indiscriminate double-blinding hypothesis on the planary level of guesstimation!
- I say this methodology sounds like its merits would not quite reach the standards required to for this kind of hypothesis.
- Oh by all standardisation boards it has its merits colleague Pursuivant.
- Whatever you say, colleague Tuulen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests