raamv wrote:
Could you please post the reference (Economist) sir? I am a bit surprised by this remark and wish to know a bit more on this... 'cos Einstein said Indian were the best!
Einstein died in 1955 way before most of us here were born - and was a physicist. What relevance does this have to the capability of ‘professional’ engineering in India?
The article I read was in the print version of the New Economist in the second quarter of last year. In the US and Australia at least, no Indian mechanical/civil engineering degree is recognised by any professional association. They want bridges etc to stay up there I guess.
lalc wrote:
If the Italian/German/European/US companies have only the cost factor in mind blowing all other reasons or facts away, its a sure short case for a sourcing failure.
I could not agree more ! India = cheap = low skills/quality = failure.
lalc wrote:
On corruption levels, India has made rapid progress in the past few years. You can check for yourself where each country stands in 2007:
Thanks for posting the link to this interesting table.
Finland transparency ranking = 1
India transparency ranking - SEVENTY TWO
I rest my case. Good for Finland !