One year later... baby!

Family life in Finland from kindergartens, child education, language schooling and everyday life. Share information and experiences. Network with other families.
Post Reply
User avatar
Nukkepöksy
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

One year later... baby!

Post by Nukkepöksy » Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:46 am

You guys gave me some great advice about baby names about a year ago. Well, now I'm three months pregnant and we've narrowed it down quite a bit to our top favourites, and want some feedback on one in particular. Here's the original post, by the way: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=59178&start=15.

We're leaving the sex of the baby a surprise, so we've had to pick a name for a girl and a boy. I know our chosen male name is a popular one, so I'm not worried about that. I'd like your advice on the name we're considering for a girl, though. We're quite stuck on Auli, but I'm curious if anyone has any ideas as to why it is SO unpopular right now (according to Väestörekisterikeskus)? Is it only because it's considered a little 'old' now, or is there another reason I don't know about? Thanks!


ImageEevaImage

One year later... baby!

Sponsor:

Finland Forum Ad-O-Matic
 

Rip
Posts: 5582
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:08 pm

Re: One year later... baby!

Post by Rip » Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:05 am

I don't think there is any particular reason. I might become more popular again in a ten years time when more of the current Aulis become grandmothers (see cases of Iida and Amanda as an example).

User avatar
Nukkepöksy
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: One year later... baby!

Post by Nukkepöksy » Sat Mar 23, 2013 2:52 pm

Excellent! I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some famous porn star named Auli, or something else. Thanks! :D
ImageEevaImage

User avatar
jahasjahas
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:08 am

Re: One year later... baby!

Post by jahasjahas » Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:51 pm

The previous thread pretty much said everything there is to say about the cyclic nature of naming trends. Names popular in the early 1900's are popular now, but from the 1930's onward they start sounding like "old people's names". Auli is from the 40's and 50's, but doesn't actually sound that bad to me. Maybe it's the shortness that makes it sound more modern than something like Kyllikki or Marjatta.

User avatar
Nukkepöksy
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: One year later... baby!

Post by Nukkepöksy » Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:09 pm

Yes, I've never been afraid of 'old people names'. Especially when they have special meaning to you or your family. I considered Aune for a girl at first because it was the name of my mummu. Something someone named CH said in that previous post I wrote, really stuck with me. They said, "(ok... Aune does sound a bit too fresh from the old people's home... so I would personally not go with it, but you adjust pretty quickly your perception of a name when you have a little old-person's-name running around)" That's what it comes down to, for me. It doesn't matter how 'old' the name is; the name has new life breathed into it with each new generation.
ImageEevaImage


Post Reply