superiorinferior wrote: Never correct your kid?
What's wrong with that? Otherwise they wouldn't know how to talk. They want help, they need guidance.
There's no need for ridicule, just a quick correction. That's not telling your kid off. Not correcting them would be neglect.
Well said.
ajdias wrote:Not saying never, my point is that pointing at their mistakes might cause them to be shy of speaking your language....If necessary I'll use the correct form 2-3 times afterwards and try to get them to reply using the correct form....As they grow older and confident in their skills it should be okay to correct them directly.
You seem to advocate the "positive enforcement" school of child-rearing which certainly boasts some merits. It recognizes the salutary effects of encouragement, reward and loving affection, each and all absolutely essential in the growth of a healthy child and perhaps each downplayed in received (from grandparents) child-rearing methods.
One of its serious handicaps however is the underlying (and often inadverdent) presumption that the child is
naturally fragile (lacking in self-esteem, timid and vulnerable) and therefore unable to handle rejection, disagreement, prohibition, let alone rebuke, anger and direct punishment.
Clinical development psychology, experience and quite frankly level-headed conventional wisdom suggest to the very contrary. Children are in fact naturally strong-minded, happy and curious. In varying degrees (conditional upon personality and temperament), children in fact naturally seek to challenge authority, dominate their peers and family-members, and test boundaries. To put it in plain French (all mothers shoot me!), the younger the kid, the more adorable a selfish son of a b@£#$ he is.
Kids are much more perplexed, less self-confident and emotionally frustrated by the
lack of clear boundaries - boundaries the overstepping of which
hurts in one harmless way or the other (emotionally, intellectually and sometimes even physically). Positive enforcement often deprives children of this clarity in addition to gloriously ill-equipping them for life in the real world, replete with necessary as well as unnecessary prohibitions and boundaries (and no, I'm not suggesting we should intentionally create unnecessary boundaries for our children). Positive enforcement fails to develop an adequately strong coping-mechanism for life as an adult.
I can hardly believe I am actually quoting Dr. Phil, but there seems to lie great truth at the core of his oft-repeated slogan "raising children is not about raising children, it's about raising adults."
Also, punishment and reward are two sides of the same coin and,
together, constitute justice. They are absolutely indissoluble. Punishment without reward teaches the child that life's anyway a bloody bleak affair, but if you do wrong, it's a living hell. Reward without punishment teaches that life's a joyride, and by doing good it's a real pleasure cruise. Both approaches teach the kid to live in a fantasy world, whether Sartrean or utopian.
A healthy reality check impels to opt for the healthy middle way.