Come on... As you should know, the way questions in a survey are phrased can radically affect the outcome. Your questions are not neutral.Soda 3.0 wrote:You have to love the way people jump to these wild assumptions - it's a shame that 'wild assumptions' isn't the topic of my story.
We're actually planning to run a series of stories on different aspect of worklife in Finland, and one issue we thought might be interesting to look at was how foreigners who have jobs here feel about their status in the company, the way they are treated, and so forth. I have no idea where the story will be largely positive or negative - though my approach is usually to feature both points of view to some extent.
Is that biased, subjective, based on preconceived ideas, or inherently offensive?
Pesonally, I think not - but I think the one we do see here is a real sentivity about this kind of topic. Which I'm happy about, of course.
You then go on to compound this in your next couple of postings
I don't know if you release this, but the results you get with this approach may well result in less foreigners being employed in Finland if, for instance, it's clear that they need special handling.Soda 3.0 wrote:Thanks Mook, that's good to hear.
I certainly agree that it takes two to tango, but there are clearly issues in some Finnish companies which pay lip service to being international, while still pursuing the 'no communication, no feedback' model more common to Finnish companies. While I think that also means international workers learn not to take 0 communication as a personal insult, I also think Finnish managers need to adapt to the needs of an international staff.
All the comments here basically result in the same thing: "please be positive...."