Post
by sophye » Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:31 pm
My husband left me suddenly, when our baby boy was just 5 weeks old. The way the separation happens, does not count. Because my husband just moved away and I stayed with the baby, he had actually no chance of getting the primary custody. If the kids live with you, it would have to be a really good reason "to change the primary caretaker".
I didn't give the baby to the father in the beginning at all. I told he can come an visit as much as he wants, but I didn't think it's appropriate to take a little baby away from the caretaker for a long time. When the baby was 6 months, he started to visit dad's place 4 hours at a time, two times a week. This decision was made in the court, by us parents. We came in to an agreement about the meetings all the way until he 18 months. Then we will see how things go and try to agree further. Now, being 12 months, our boy spends 6 hours at dad's place, twice a week. In two months he will start to go and spend one night every two weeks. An agreement made during the court process is as valid as the court's decision.
Joint custody is the primary way to solve the custody in finland. You have to have a really good reason to not to end up in joint custody. I tried to get the custody alone, because we could not agree about things concerning the child. The only way to agree was that I do what he says. We really had majure disagreements on the child's caretaking, health, day care options, living...I as well have a fear of him kidnapping the child to his home country, I'm finnish and he is not. The court ended up in joint custody, because we already showed some agreeing with the meetings, so they didn't think agreeing is impossible. Luckily our situation has since improved and we can quite well be parents together and make decisions.
I have heard that the court decision about the meetings can be based on the history as well. If you already have some kind of rutine in it and it seems to work, they will not change it. One week/ one week system is not usually recommended with small kids, because it might be confusing and the child might feel unsafe, not really having a home anywhere. Of course situations are different, as well as kids are. Sharing the living of the kids 50/50 as well needs a lot of co-operation and good communication from the parents.
What ever you do, don't thread with the kidnapping, or don't even talk about it, it might cost you your kids. I myself was surprised that anything can be presented in the court and it's your job to prove it right or wrong. My ex-husband spoke such things about me that I was not prepared. He twisted everything around and made up things, and I should have been able to prove them wrong. How do you prove what happened in a private conversation? I was just quiet, I didn't feel like fighting anymore or starting to do the same, since I felt how much it hurts.
Well, luckily we are fine now. Still afraid of loosing my boy, since the dad has made couple of jokes about not returning him. I'm avoiding all conflicts so that at least I don't push him to take it to the extreme. I don't think this kind of father has any rights to the child, but I do think the child has the right to both parents. That's why I'm just holding on to provide what I think is truly best for my boy, having a good relationship with his father too.
Good luck and all the best for you!