@Oho I didn't mention anything about educating foreign students. That's your take on the situation. As far as the refugee situation is concerned, many who get as far north as Finland and Scandinavia are well-educated. The others are stuck in Turkey.
But since you ask,
- educating foreigners provides jobs for well-educated Finns. There are very few foreigners working as teachers in the UAS, the vast majority are Finns, including engineers who have turned to teaching after a career in - now off-shored - industry.
- educating foreigners provides expertise to emerging economies that have no resources or infra-structure for educating young people in a wide range of practical engineering and business skills from farming and agriculture to mechanical, construction and environmental engineering. Most return to their home countries because (a) they want to (b) they don't have a job here and therefore no RP (c) they realise the opportunities to become successful entrepreneurs is greater in their home country than here
- educating foreigners gives Finnish students an opportunity to understand other cultures - a skill which is essential if Finland ever hopes to export new technology, products and services abroad
- educating foreigners is one place Finland can excel over other countries (Holland and Denmark are both starting to offer courses in English but not on the same scale as Finland).
I might be wrong, but I don't think that offering study places to foreign students has ever been a government strategy for solving the demographics here. What's more, since the Universities Act was introduced a couple of years ago, the UAS are operating quasi-independently and have bottom-line responsibility to balance their books. Of course, they don't have to run entrance examinations abroad (some don't) but what would be the sense of running an international business degree programme with no international students enrolled

Many of the big engineering programmes are backed by multinational companies (eg Kone, Sako at Mech. Eng. in HAMK) who need international graduates for their worldwide markets.
But, that is nothing to do with the chronic shortage of care workers in the public sector. It's nice to think that the current 60 somethings are super fit and healthy (or at least fitter and healthier than 60 somethings ten or twenty years ago) - but even if that is the case, the real problems are only a decade away. Those people will eventually need help and in Finland most families expect the State to provide care. I guess things may be different outside the capital region - but personally I don't know many families with live-in grandparents. (And that's no criticism of the Finns, since the situation is very much the same in the rest of western Europe).
So solving that with immigration doesn't tickle your fancy.... but what does? How do you propose to solve these issues? How do you suggest we fill the hundreds of open vacancies in the daycares, mental health hospitals and clinics, care homes for seniors etc. ?
(PS I didn't get the bit about me having a chip on my shoulder. Care to elaborate?)