Even i'd take up arms to prevent that!!debonaire wrote: Russia would invade Finland to capture Santa Claus...

Even i'd take up arms to prevent that!!debonaire wrote: Russia would invade Finland to capture Santa Claus...
Yes i am, im finnish man who tells how things are.EP wrote:You are really something, aren´t you?His birth country forces arent relevant to me, only thing what matters is finnish force.
I cant care less if he did his time in lesotho or UK, finnish service is what matters, if you want be finnish then do what finnish have to do.
Yes im xenophil racist finn but so are most employers i know and most finnish friends i have, thats how it is. Live whit it.
If the army in Lesotho has already taught him how to behave if somebody attacs, why the hell would he have to do it all over again in Finland. If somebody attacs Finland he would know perfectly well how to shoot (or whatever) with the teaching he got in Lesotho.
Nonsense.Training in lesotho is null, nill, nothing.
You mean that time when Russia tried to protect Leningrad after Finland had attacked Russia twice?Hank W. wrote: "Security of St Petersburg" like the last time.
Of course they in "lesotho" or where ever train in finnish enviroment with finnish armaments and for winter (do they have a winter in there?).EP wrote:Nonsense.Training in lesotho is null, nill, nothing.
It would be just stupid waste of limited resources to start training people who have already been trained elsewhere.
I see, you still use the old history books in Russia.You mean that time when Russia tried to protect Leningrad after Finland had attacked Russia twice?
antstar wrote:Well, still average soldiers still need to learn basics like fire groups and manouvering
Yep thats why i said even though you may have been with another army tactics are different, and like our friendly Finn onkko says, weather condition training is a good point also.Karhunkoski wrote:antstar wrote:Well, still average soldiers still need to learn basics like fire groups and manouvering
And fireteam tactics can differ greatly between armies.
Finland had attacked Russia before 1939 when exactly since the border treaty of 1921?Russian wrote:You mean that time when Russia tried to protect Leningrad after Finland had attacked Russia twice?Hank W. wrote: "Security of St Petersburg" like the last time.
Why? We take an independent sourceEP wrote: I see, you still use the old history books in Russia.
See my previous post.Hank W. wrote: Finland had attacked Russia before 1939 when exactly since the border treaty of 1921?
Goddammit, that was hilariousfriendly Finn onkko
Do your books tell how you supported fascist Germany to raise to power, made possible for German rearmament, aided it in its war efforts, and started the 2nd world war by invading Poland?Russian wrote:By the way, do our books lie about Finland siding with fascist Germany in WWII as well?
Are you taught reading comprehension? The Finnish government disallowed support to the Karelian insurgency - and that was in Karelian SSSR which is nowhere close to Leningrad. Besides which Finland and USSR had a new non-aggression pact in 1932. And how exactly could the Finnish army with its meager resources pose any kind of threat to the USSR? 250,000 men, 30 tanks, 130 aircraft???Russian wrote:See my previous post.Hank W. wrote: Finland had attacked Russia before 1939 when exactly since the border treaty of 1921?