Understood.
To be fair, I also think this is not entirely a problem for Finland, but more a West dominant issue. Finland is one of the players.
Take this example, country wants to bring in 500.000 immigrants. Each principal immigrant is required to bring IIRC, 10.000.
10.000 * 500.000 = 5.000.000.000 !!!
That in itself has become a self-sustaining industry of modern slavery.
Get the immigrant to come in, bring money, and then earn money and pay taxes, so natives can live on the generous welfare - and still treat immigrants with racism, weakened job opportunities.
If I had the option, I'd e.g. keep the unemployment insurance active and more generous to the immigrant than to the native. I am now familiar with a lot of the highly-skilled immigrants whose résumé have been flipped out simply because of the name, or other such features, some being "native language" skills.
Equality. Equity. Justice. For me would mean that e.g. Finland has NOT paid for the immigrants birth onwards (pre-natal, neo-natal, early childhood, schooling, higher education) as they have done for the native.
If Finland has not paid for the birth onwards, the immigrants don't pay for the benefits either. E.g. The immigrant generation pays 1/10 of the tax bracket, healthcare-schooling etc. That puts the immigrant and native on a level playing field.
In that sense, I like the Middle Eastern countries. You don't get citizenship, PR etc. On the other hand, they don't take a share of your income to pay for their [subtly speaking] breakfast, sauna-as-apartment-taxi etc. needs either.