Windows Vista to Windows XP
- rauginta_kojine
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:23 pm
- Location: Helsinki
- Contact:
Windows Vista to Windows XP
Hi guys!
Maybe this topic has nothing to do with living in Finland, but as I am living in Finlan, and when I have a problem here and do not know whom to ask for help, then I think I can get some interesting suggestions here.
So my problem is this : I have bought a second hand laptop recently, and here the operating system is Windows Vista. I dont like it, so as my boyfriend has Windows XP installation, we decided to change it. But while installing, there occured some error, telling that something isnt ok. We tried to install two times and both times occured the same error. This never happened before when my boyfriend was like instlling his Windows XP into a new one. What could be the problem and wht shall we do?
Is it possible that if this laptop had Windows Vista installed when buying, that it is impossible to change the whole operating system to any other Windows operating system?
Please Help!
Thanks in advance
Maybe this topic has nothing to do with living in Finland, but as I am living in Finlan, and when I have a problem here and do not know whom to ask for help, then I think I can get some interesting suggestions here.
So my problem is this : I have bought a second hand laptop recently, and here the operating system is Windows Vista. I dont like it, so as my boyfriend has Windows XP installation, we decided to change it. But while installing, there occured some error, telling that something isnt ok. We tried to install two times and both times occured the same error. This never happened before when my boyfriend was like instlling his Windows XP into a new one. What could be the problem and wht shall we do?
Is it possible that if this laptop had Windows Vista installed when buying, that it is impossible to change the whole operating system to any other Windows operating system?
Please Help!
Thanks in advance
- Karhunkoski
- Posts: 7034
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:44 pm
- Location: Keski-Suomi
- littlefrank
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: eläkeläinenmäki
- Karhunkoski
- Posts: 7034
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:44 pm
- Location: Keski-Suomi
Hmmm, my understanding was that OEM versions tie themselves to only one machine (I think the definition is motherboard, so if you change this, the new install will not work). A retail version can be installed on one computer, then if you build a new computer, you can install XP to there (of course legally you should uninstall XP from the original machine). I always thought that was the explanation for the difference in price between OEM and Retail versions ??DMC wrote:> Isn't there something where OEM ties itself to hardware to prevent multiple installations?
I think that applies to most versions, including full retail versions.
Political correctness is the belief that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
> Hmmm, my understanding was that OEM versions tie themselves to only one machine (I think the definition is motherboard, so if you change this, the new install will not work).
Oh yes, good call. I had forgotten that. The normal retail version allows some hardware changes without crying foul, but the OEM version is less tolerant.
Oh yes, good call. I had forgotten that. The normal retail version allows some hardware changes without crying foul, but the OEM version is less tolerant.
- littlefrank
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: eläkeläinenmäki
The 'brand name' name computers usually supply you with an OEM (Original equipment manufacturer) OS disk, this is not usually the full OS version because they load the start up files onto the actual hdd or in a small partition, this means of course that if you try to load a different OS on it, it doesn't like it. So you have to delete these start up files (format, delete partition) and use a full installation disk. The motherboard doesn't make a difference.
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
- Popular Mechanics, 1949
- Popular Mechanics, 1949
- Karhunkoski
- Posts: 7034
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:44 pm
- Location: Keski-Suomi
I'm guessing Vista uses more RAM, so if you have less RAM then XP is a better option. Also I remember getting XP when pre-installed on a machine when it first came out, it seemed that twice a day it was having to install "updates", then the usual, "restart your computer now", it was rather annoying.
Just my 2 cents. I'm sure a real computer expert will be along soon to tell me that's just "not so"
Just my 2 cents. I'm sure a real computer expert will be along soon to tell me that's just "not so"

Political correctness is the belief that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
- littlefrank
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: eläkeläinenmäki
'I'm guessing Vista uses more RAM'
True but you also need to have a really good graphic card, system to run it for it's full 'benefits' (?), also there are a lot of compatability problems, as with any new windows OS, e.g. Windows XP home service pack 1 was a nightmare to use when it first came out, always best to wait a while before using a new windows OS. Of course if you have the right system and you don't use the software that has compatibilty problems, then obviously there will be no problems, well not too many anyway.
http://www.searchcio.com.au/topics/arti ... &SiteID=19
http://www.vnunet.com/itweek/analysis/2 ... ce-3665984
True but you also need to have a really good graphic card, system to run it for it's full 'benefits' (?), also there are a lot of compatability problems, as with any new windows OS, e.g. Windows XP home service pack 1 was a nightmare to use when it first came out, always best to wait a while before using a new windows OS. Of course if you have the right system and you don't use the software that has compatibilty problems, then obviously there will be no problems, well not too many anyway.
http://www.searchcio.com.au/topics/arti ... &SiteID=19
http://www.vnunet.com/itweek/analysis/2 ... ce-3665984
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
- Popular Mechanics, 1949
- Popular Mechanics, 1949
- Karhunkoski
- Posts: 7034
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:44 pm
- Location: Keski-Suomi
- littlefrank
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: eläkeläinenmäki
- Karhunkoski
- Posts: 7034
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:44 pm
- Location: Keski-Suomi