Well the assistants are supposed to be the referee's "eyes in the back of his head" but of course its not always easy, especially if a defence is playing the offside trap constantly, that diverts most of the assistants attention.WLM wrote:Don't mind me, Olly, it's just a hobby-horse I have. it's not really about "decisions", more about the ref not having eyes in the back of his head. I've read one too many times that "the referee didn't see it", and I've seen one too many times that the players KNEW the referee couldn't see it, and I've become quite disgusted with all the s-h1te that goes down off the ball and out of sight and out of mind in the professional game.
At the Finland Italy game in Helsinki (a great example of poor refereeing). There was an incident that perfectly illustrates this point. The referee was facing the corner flag where the action was taking place (an Italian player trying to beat the full back to put the cross in). The linesman was running full pelt trying to keep up and probably concentrating on any possibility of offside (his priority).
Meanwhile in the Finland penalty box the Italian striker pushes his marker over (definite yellow card). The cross comes in to the Italian player (who is obviously completely unmarked as the Finnish players eating soil). And he Pops the ball in the net.
Now I would say thats the refs fault as it was in the penalty box. A lot of refs I work with tell me that the penalty box is theirs and I should only clock the offsides, throw ins, corners, goal kicks and nearby infringements, when im working as a linesman. Personally I dont like that though and think the linesman should flag any infringement he see's in the box too. And at that level the linesman should be doing just that.
It's a good example of the blind spot you talk about, and again if the refs completely unaware of the infringement in the first place how can he call on the assistance of a 5th official with video replay?
I wished I'd had video evidence this evening

