penelope wrote:sinikala wrote: ... 10% in a couple of years isn't too bad.
.... until you compare it to the cost of petrol/diesel in the same period.
Karhunkoski already covered it somewhat, but the cost of fuel as a fraction of the compensation (km korvaus) is perhaps only 20%.
If I drive to Otaniemi or head office and back ... it's a 480km round trip.
Our cars both do 6.5Litre/100km on sub-urban trips = 31.2L / 480km.
2 years ago petrol was €1.15 / Litre, fuel cost = €35.88
Today at €1.43 / litre, fuel cost = €44.62
Increase in fuel cost = €8.74
2 years ago km korvaus = 480 x €0.40 = €192.00
Today km korvaus = 480 x €0.44 = €211.20.
Increase in km korvaus €19.20
So the increase in the cost of fuel has been covered.
Cory wrote:Actually, when all is taken into account, including the depreciating value of the car for every km driven, .44 / km doesn't cover it.
Depends on the age and value of your car. Nordea's website in trying to push people to buy new cars reads that Finland has the oldest cars in Western Europe - 10.5 years being the average age. Coincidentally both of our cars are just over 10 years old.
At that age the depreciation per km is rather small, and we fully intend to hold on to our cars for another 2-3 years, if they continue to run well (we get them serviced every 6 months).
Cory wrote:Those lucky enough to live in the city and close to their work can afford to live without a car. Not all of us have the luxury of public transport.

That is true, also I live close to my work but still do enough business travel that it necessitates that I have my own car (my wife needs her car for the 50km drive to her work). Also, not all of us have the luxury of a car that depreciates much by driving it!
