Where to buy? Where can I find? How do I? Getting started.
-
Rosamunda
- Posts: 10650
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:07 am
Post
by Rosamunda » Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:53 am
sinikettu wrote:
Even the idea of making all hand gun licences subject to the providing of "a mental health evaluation by a doctor, certifying that the permit-seeker does not have any mental illness or problems that might pose danger to him or herself or others" is not a sure stop all.
It also assumes that doctors will be willing to do this task.
It only takes the finger of blame to be pointed at one doctor, who issued an OK certificate to someone, who later runs amok with a gun, for the medical profession to stop this work. Medical diagnostics can never be 100% sure.
That is if they ever agree to start this task.
Read here.
http://www.yle.fi/news/left/id103162.html
I can understand why the medical assoc does not agree to this. Medical professionals are needed on the ground, helping sick people, not in offices filling in pieces of paper. And such a system would put any individual doctor in a difficult position since he may fear reprisals for giving a negative assessment. Surely the army would be the best place to do this. Apparently they are already doing some kind of assessment during military service (which is presumably why Saari was sent home to grow up). And spending a year in the army could be a pre-requisite for having a gun licence anyway.... rather than the "join a shooting club" that was introduced a year or so ago. And I don't think this discriminates against women, they can volunteer for the army if they want to. It would also effectively increase the age for legally holding firearms to at least 18 yrs.
Agree with the others though. This won't fix the fact that there are kids with bad karma out there.
Re: Here we go again..another school shooting
Sponsor:
-
Finland Forum Ad-O-Matic
-
-
paulrenn
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 7:50 pm
- Location: Tuusula
Post
by paulrenn » Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:02 am
TampereOwl wrote:sinikala wrote:Pursuivant wrote:what was that village some fishermen actually did pull the plug off a pond and emptied it into some old mineshafts?
Don't know, but the picture is probably one of the overflows at Ladybower reservoir in Derbyshire.
Yep...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladybower_Reservoir
All the best for your return to the US Scuba, any thoughts on returning to Finland in the future or did you get your fill?
That's the closest 'lake' to where I grew up, and those terrifying plugholes the reason I find it a little bit daring to go swimming in a lake.
Wow, I have been many times to Ladybower when I were a nipper but never saw that overflow...must be pretty astonishing sight.
Seems like there are quite a few refugees from "Oop North" around

Paul
-
TampereOwl
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:56 pm
Post
by TampereOwl » Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:15 pm
We spent many a Sunday tramping round the Peaks when I was a kid, and they often involved driving past Ladybower and stopping at the damns for a cup of tea. They were usually in full flow in February, March and April, if I remember right, and I thought they must have had them on the bottom of the reservoir too....
If we ever went swimming it was up at Slippery Stones.
-
Upphew
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:55 pm
- Location: Lappeenranta
Post
by Upphew » Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:21 pm
penelope wrote:
And spending a year in the army could be a pre-requisite for having a gun licence anyway.... rather than the "join a shooting club" that was introduced a year or so ago. And I don't think this discriminates against women, they can volunteer for the army if they want to. It would also effectively increase the age for legally holding firearms to at least 18 yrs.
Agree with the others though. This won't fix the fact that there are kids with bad karma out there.
I don't agree with mandatory military training before gun license. It would mean that some people couldn't get gun license even though they would be mentally ok to carry, but not physically able go to the army (amputee, bad knees, allergy, etc.). And what about those that can't go to the army anymore (too old) but would like to have a permit (immigrants and returning expats comes to mind)?
http://google.com http://translate.google.com http://urbandictionary.com
Visa is for visiting, Residence Permit for residing.
-
Tiwaz
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:21 am
Post
by Tiwaz » Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:54 pm
Ownership of a gun is not right. If you can't go through army, maybe alternative could be found but it should be one which does not permit you to get past any easier.
Namely, extensive tests etc (preferably on applicants money).
Wanting a permit should never be enough, you need reason for the permit.
-
Pursuivant
- Posts: 15089
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: Bath & Wells
Post
by Pursuivant » Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:15 pm
I'd say a similar tests you need to get a permit for gas when you are a security guard... you need more testing for that than a handgun for sports...
"By the pricking of my thumbs,
Something wicked this way comes."
-
sinikettu
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:16 pm
Post
by sinikettu » Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:23 pm
There is a very good feature article in the Int Hesa.
It is quite long but this point is very relevant.
The small pistols used in Jokela and Kauhajoki had nothing to do with sports shooting, says Risto Aarrekivi,
executive director of the Finnish Shooting Sport Federation.
The guns used in Jokela and Kauhajoki were .22 calibre pistols.
The type was previously popular in competitive shooting, but then some .22 calibre pistols came onto the market
that were certainly no sporting goods. They were copies of larger pistols used by police and soldiers.
“They are militaristic in appearance, and appeal to people who want to swagger and intimidate others, but who are
unable to get licences for a larger weapon”, says Helsinki gun dealer William Waldstein.
“I am amazed that anyone would want to grant a licence for something like that”, Aarrekivi says.
Read the rest of the article here
http://www.hs.fi/english/article/A+fare ... 5239858082
Here are a couple of photos to help illustrate the point.
1: A competition 0.22 hand gun.
http://www.vapa.org.au/Images/Free%20Pistol%202.jpg
2: The Gun used in the school shotings.
http://www.weaponryonline.com/images/re ... er-p22.jpg
People do not become more irritable as they grow old - they simply stop making the effort to avoid annoying others.
-
luckykitty
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:18 pm
Post
by luckykitty » Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:24 am
Yeah exactly, i kept wondering all along why people would be allowed these guns. Under the laws, u're not supposed to use them except at appropriate venues, like a shooting club or some show or something,. Why should people even own these kinds of guns, like automatic pistols :s. And also people should really look at bullying in school or mental issues, cos the ppl who turn into gunmen are usually mad at society or feel ostracised or feel like loners, so there must be some way to help these people and create a healthier social environment, especially in highschool etc.
-
onkko
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:24 am
- Location: kemijärvi
Post
by onkko » Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:05 am
"this kind of weapon" oh yeh...
My friends have shotguns and rifles for hunting, few euros and they have semi automatic shotgun with 10 shot magazine. Lets talk about how lethal that is..
And about "that kind of weapon".. i can buy uzi if i want to, i have shot with assault rifle without permission and could buy it with 2000e. 9mm handgun with 200e and no one asks for permits..
Caesare weold Graecum, ond Caelic Finnum
-
sinikettu
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:16 pm
Post
by sinikettu » Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:48 am
onkko wrote: i can buy uzi if i want to, i have shot with assault rifle without permission and ..
I have read many of your posts and thought that you might be a dick head..now you confirm my thoughts.
This news item would imply that "N" should pass your IP address to the authorities and/or block it.
moi moi...
http://www.yle.fi/news/id103208.html
People do not become more irritable as they grow old - they simply stop making the effort to avoid annoying others.
-
Chrysoberyl
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:42 am
- Location: Helsinki
Post
by Chrysoberyl » Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:03 am
sinikettu wrote:There is a very good feature article in the Int Hesa.
It is quite long but this point is very relevant.
The small pistols used in Jokela and Kauhajoki had nothing to do with sports shooting, says Risto Aarrekivi,
executive director of the Finnish Shooting Sport Federation.
The guns used in Jokela and Kauhajoki were .22 calibre pistols.
The type was previously popular in competitive shooting, but then some .22 calibre pistols came onto the market
that were certainly no sporting goods. They were copies of larger pistols used by police and soldiers.
“They are militaristic in appearance, and appeal to people who want to swagger and intimidate others, but who are
unable to get licences for a larger weapon”, says Helsinki gun dealer William Waldstein.
“I am amazed that anyone would want to grant a licence for something like that”, Aarrekivi says.
Read the rest of the article here
http://www.hs.fi/english/article/A+fare ... 5239858082
Here are a couple of photos to help illustrate the point.
1: A competition 0.22 hand gun.
http://www.vapa.org.au/Images/Free%20Pistol%202.jpg
2: The Gun used in the school shotings.
http://www.weaponryonline.com/images/re ... er-p22.jpg
This is basically true,but at the same time quite inaccurate.The competition pistol shown is a single shot, designed for 50m free pistol,which is only one modality among several in pistol competitive shooting.For 25m standard pistol you need a
semi automatic .22 pistol,and although of course the Walther shown there wouldn't qualify,there are other models in the market that would be an excellent first gun for those starting this sport without having to shell the thousands of euros required for a professional competition pistol.Are those guns to be banned? you can definitely kill with a competition pistol too,that's for sure.Suddenly,everybody involved with this hobby is going to pay for
two events in decades of responsible gun ownership in Finland.
Last edited by
Chrysoberyl on Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
sinikettu
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:16 pm
Post
by sinikettu » Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:27 am
Chrysoberyl wrote:.For 25m standard pistol you need a semi automatic .22 pistol,and although of course the Walther shown there wouldn't qualify,there are other models in the market that would be an excellent first gun for those starting this sport without having to shell the thousands of euros required for a professional competition pistol.
Are those guns to be banned?
Suddenly,everybody involved with this hobby is going to pay for two events in decades of responsible gun owning in Finland.
The point that Risto Aarrekivi, executive director of the Finnish Shooting Sport Federation, was trying to make that you seem to over look, is his specific reference to the gun type used in both shootings; a Walther P22.
He said..
“I am amazed that anyone would want to grant a licence for something like that”
I would hope in future that those who issue gun licences will have the benifit of advice, from the likes of Mr Aarrekivi, as to what is a real sporting gun, and what is just a macho status symbol like the Walther P22.
People do not become more irritable as they grow old - they simply stop making the effort to avoid annoying others.
-
Pursuivant
- Posts: 15089
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: Bath & Wells
Post
by Pursuivant » Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:33 am
if thats a macho gun its like getting a porsche-built VW doka instead of 911 as a peniksenjatke
"By the pricking of my thumbs,
Something wicked this way comes."
-
sinikettu
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:16 pm
Post
by sinikettu » Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:40 am
Pursuivant wrote:if thats a macho gun its like getting a porsche-built VW doka instead of 911 as a peniksenjatke
Macho looking gun...like macho looking car..
I saw a Fiat with a Ferrari badge on it last week..I could see it was not a Ferrari, but I cannot tell from that photo of a Walther P22 that it is not a 0.45 Magnum, but like most others on this board I know Ferrari from a Fiat, but not a 0.22 Plinker (name given to guns that prentend to be their bigger brother) from a police Magnum, especialy if it is being waved under my nose by a nut case.
People do not become more irritable as they grow old - they simply stop making the effort to avoid annoying others.
-
luckykitty
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:18 pm
Post
by luckykitty » Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:44 am
Maybe for sports shooting they could lend out the guns at the venue so people wouldn't have to take them home or to school? Like you could borrow it while at a shooting club. But yeah, its pretty complex. The real cause of the incident is that the shooter had mental issues or some problem against life/society etc, but the other problem is that its so easy for people like that to get a gun, maybe the government should at least try to make it harder somehow. Maybe a very long waiting period until they can get a gun :O, like after they are 25 or something? Maybe their teen angst or homicidal rage will have subsided (not guaranteed, although maybe they would have come across some psychiatric help by then). They are all kind of copycat murders, at least the idea is the same, and we know that teens tend to copy other people or celebrities. Somehow it seems like young people are searching for some kinda self identity but half the time they just borrow that from someone else because its hard finding your own (look at street fashion? :S). It's really weird that these people commiting these acts of mass violence can't see that shooting random people isn't going to help society, it's kind of like people entranced by some cult or some idol or something, and doing whatever they see some other 'role model' do. Or they are just so full of rage that they just cracked and could do something like that. What happened to empathy for other people? No wonder someone wrote in to the newspaper about cleaning up TV violence: I dont think its that we get ideas from violent movies, its just that some people are so desensitised to violence that maybe they dont have any empathy towards other humans at all. And i guess guns are also glorified too much in movies. (Yes and the shooters tended to favour guns that look 'cool' or macho. Maybe if we only sell guns that look really thin, wooden and un'macho' they would be too embarrassed to use them cos it would look daft committing mass crime with aforementioned sports pistol? :S). Pursuivant: maybe it was as macho as their student budgets could afford :s. Anyway its not like people buy uzis (except onkko), we have to take into account what THESE guys would like.
http://www.wayodd.com/guns-used-at-virg ... eo/v/7017/
even the Virginia Tech killer used the same gun! It's a trend, just ban the Walter 22 or anything that looks like similarly shaped to those arcade guns for Time Crisis or something

.