I understand entirely the reasons why the UK refused to go along with the European wiring and plug/socket system.
I am not an electrician, but I know that the UK fuse system is much safer in case of accident than the Euro standard. To claim that the Finnish system demonstrates Darwinism in action is fallacious. The European system was designed for cheapness and no other reason. Now, of course, the incremental cost of the UK system is miniscule and the cost of changing is huge. There is no good reason for designing a system without sensible failsafes, OTOH I can understand why, again for cost; Europe ain't about to follow the UK lead.
In my previous business, we had good reason to be happy with the fused plug system, it enabled us to work efficiently in surroundings where the supply was possibly 'compromised'. In Finland such work would not be possible, or much more costly to carry out.
Interstingly, I have noiced in Finland, particularly in connection with domestic PCs, a lot of power supply accessories designed to protect the computer and data. Smoothers, emergency power supplies etc. These are just not considered necessary on the UK, for domestic use. Is this somethin gof a comment on the quality of supply in areas away from Helsinki city centre, or another example of Finnish 'risk aversion'?
