pieni älykkyystesti - a small intelligence test

Learn and discuss the Finnish language with Finn's and foreigners alike
Rob A.
Posts: 3966
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:51 am

Re: pieni älykkyystesti - a small intelligence test

Post by Rob A. » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:31 am

AldenG wrote:That one wasn't too hard because there aren't that many numbers divisible by 11. Plus intuition tells you it has to be within a certain range because of how sums and products grow differently. And as you look at likely options there's a quick convergence toward the solution.

I'd say be less formal and try accessing the non-scientist within you. :wink:
It seems to be one of those puzzles that can't be solved algebraically...well, maybe, but others will have to figure that out... Like Fermat's Last Theorem.... :wink:

I figured out the answer through good old trial and error....

You can "approach" a solution this way:

(100x + 10y + z)/11=x + y + z

which reduces to:

100x + 10y + z - 11x - 11y - 11z = 0

89x - y - 10z = 0

You know that all digits must be between "0" and "9"


So right away you know that "x" must equal "1" ...any higher number would not be possible, nor would "0" be possible.

So now we have:

y + 10z = 89 [Note: The highest possible number on the left side of the equation is "99"...so "2" is immediately eliminated as a solution for "x". ]

and now we can "solve" for "z"...only "8" is possible..."7" and "9" are either too low or too high.

And therefore "y" can only be "9"....

And there's the answer... "198"

If there is a more "elegant" mathematical solution to this it is beyond me....

And it would be rather painful to have to go through this if the multiple were, say, "111" :D



Re: pieni älykkyystesti - a small intelligence test

Sponsor:

Finland Forum Ad-O-Matic
 

User avatar
jahasjahas
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:08 am

Re: pieni älykkyystesti - a small intelligence test

Post by jahasjahas » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:14 pm

I was happy with my 0, so I didn't even bother using a third digit! Even that second digit was a waste of good computational power.

Rob A.
Posts: 3966
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:51 am

Re: pieni älykkyystesti - a small intelligence test

Post by Rob A. » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:28 pm

jahasjahas wrote:I was happy with my 0, so I didn't even bother using a third digit! Even that second digit was a waste of good computational power.
Yeah... your version is more "efficient"....and actually I missed your "spoiler" yesterday....I saw the word there, but my vision is so poor all I saw was white space (or "grey space"), until I "squinted" really closely at it this morning... :wink:


Post Reply