Your last observation about the finnish government wasting resources on paying unemployment benefits to healthy young people sitting idle at home, draws me to some considerations.
Could it be that there are at least a couple of different perspectives to be considered
when it comes to evaluating the shortcomings of the TE services ?
(1) On one side there is the risk that a certain part of the population, being them uneducated finnish nationals ( but could be also immigrants) for a number of reasons are apt at exploiting a system so as to do the minimum possible opportunistically.
(2) On the other side there is a significant portion of educated people coming from abroad, that even if qualified, find many difficulties to get a position and are eager to work even if this means doing unpaid internships, as long as those activities bring them meaningful contacts and so on. We are not talking about people who drink beer, smoke on the sofa and things like that, but qualified professionals ( not IT ) who actually find very difficult to start working in their respective sector.
Anyway this discussion is very interesting, and offers many points to reflect upon
It seems to me that in the average mind-set .. the idea of TE is associated with some sort of social stigma.. is it so ?
People who go there must be very possibly good-for-nothing, drunkard or opportunists .....