Did they get license to kill? Buses and Lorries!!

[Upphew]

Volvo. Almost 100% of time the one who crashes to back end of another car, the one behind is the guilty one.

This is a common misconception. If the lorry changes lanes in front of the Volvo and the Volvo crashes into it, it is the lorry driver who's at fault - regardless of whether he used his signal or not.

True, the lane change must be done in a way that the users of other lane won't need to use brakes. Without witnesses it can be quite hard to pin it on the lorry though, imo.

[gfunho]

This is a common misconception. If the lorry changes lanes in front of the Volvo and the Volvo crashes into it, it is the lorry driver who's at fault - regardless of whether he used his signal or not.

Unless you have a witness willing to declare that, if it is your word against the lorry driver's word, you will probably lose and the accident will be declared "your fault".

No insurance company is willing to pay for the accidents so when they represent you they will do all that is in their hands to blame the other, and the one that hits the other one from behind is usually declared guilty, unless there is a way of proving the lorry did something wrong (as I said before with e.g. a witness).

[Upphew]

Not to mention that the lorry's speed can be checked. If you manage to crash to it from behind, you have gone too fast...