EnglishHank W. wrote:And where does that read? Denmark has been in the EU before jebus rode the dinosaurs and they have 140% tax.sinikala wrote:Finland must according to EU legislation remove all those taxes on importing used cars.
Finnish
No, we don't have a car at all - thus it's no wonder if I've left some important things out of the equation...sinikala wrote:On 2 car families. Are you a driver? The cost of the car is only 1 factor ... fuel, insurance, servicing, buying replacement parts are also major costs. Those families that need 2 cars will already have 2. The sales tax on a new car will not, IMHO, be the main factor in deciding if a second car will be bought.
sinikala wrote:So far you have all missed the main point (IMHO). Finland must according to EU legislation remove all those taxes on importing used cars.
which may not include permanent residents..to carry out a task of definite duration
No. there is NO tax on importing cars. But there is a tax to register a car. This applies for both domestic and imported cars. So everyone is treated equal and the market is fair.sinikala wrote:So far you have all missed the main point (IMHO). Finland must according to EU legislation remove all those taxes on importing used cars.
Sammy dont read too much into things...sammy wrote:That much is clearbut what about the total amount of emissions... let's say - a family now has one car with X amount of emissions. Lo and behold: those cars that only produce 2/3 of X become cheaper... family decides, okay we'll now buy two cheap low-emission cars... -> their total emissions rise from the original amount X.
So the question is... if we forget about the cheap price... will it make any difference concerning the emissions, if people just consume more, and buy more cars? Even if they are low emission ones?
If you really think about it...Not much of an incentive to buy for those who cannot afford..as the prices are still expensive..Seven wrote:on the other side with less money people could buy new cars that are with less pollution than old cars that are using now.
its called lisävarusteet!!! They jack up those lists very often.. now-a-days, they are even following some Texan model of giving "Cash-back"...zax wrote:It'll be interesting to see if:
1) the cost in the showroom really reduces by the same amount as the tax cut. Watch the dealers try to skim something from the middle, we're all used to high prices anyway.
i agree with you, i just can't believe that untill now no one wanted to explore something other than oil !! when the oil price is going to hit 100d to a barrel...now they want to find alternative to petrol, i just want to see the rug pulled out of the fat bottom of the middle east sheihks..........cow-heada wrote:What we need is a single invention - a battery that lasts. That would completely kill this whole debate.
It is hard to believe that since the invention of basic petrol engine we've landed on the moon and found a way to store the centuries music on a single pocket sized disk - but we still run petrol.
Its almost like somewhere, out there, somebody is pulling all the strings
I believe that older cars would be taxed based on weight.zax wrote:Just wondering (I probably missed this bit somewhere in the details)... how does the taxation of used (imported) cars change under this scheme? Registration tax based on emissions or does it remain the same as it is now?
Not sure what the co2 emissions of a '69 Dodge Charger would be