Mattlill2000 wrote:That sounds like a comment from a "city slicker" who is lost because all previous known markers of direction are gone. On the other hand, a seasoned "hick" can read a forest immediatly and will find their way. No problem and like you mentioned, landmarks etc. are the same as street signs. In Finland, the first group of people that come into mind are hunters, berry pickers and hikers, etc. Also the idea of Private Property and No Trespassing doesn't apply here and possibly then that means there is more outdoor activity in the wilderness here. Just to walk blindly into a forest isn't very clever.And, as well, I'd be interested in what a typical rural Finn might think of this event...


And, I'm actually pretty good in the bush... though I've lived in an urban environment for a long time now... I find that there are usually some "transitional issues" if I do go into a real wilderness... I sort of have to "recalibrate"... In rough terrain getting lost should be almost "impossible"...there are so many clues around you..., but in the "dead flat" terrain around Dawson Creek and Fort St. John...and I know you know where these places are... you want to think a bit before you go in....but there are still clues...moss, the sun, of course, growth direction of plants ...another time I got lost up in the Mackenzie delta...in a small boat in a side channel....but it all turned out OK... I climbed up a tall pine tree and could then see the main channel off in the distance...
